Duration: 07:32 minutes Upload Time: 06-10-30 14:26:04 User: TheHour :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Since 9/11 there have been various claims that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane at all, that it was actually a missile - an American missile. |
|
Comments | |
uhaegde ::: Favorites Shit he cannot answer... Well he just simply avoids. Modern Journalism; keep the mind ready to walk away from relevant and solid arguments. 07-09-15 00:18:37 __________________________________________________ | |
uhaegde ::: Favorites "They were unprepaired because they thought this kind of thing would never happen" UHHHHMMMM NO!!! What about the FEMA report that was released picturing the World Trade Center in Crosshairs on its cover??? Just look up "August 1997 FEMA's Emergency Response to Terrorism handbook" on Google 07-09-15 00:16:04 __________________________________________________ | |
uhaegde ::: Favorites emphasis on the following... BOTH SURVEILLANCE VIDEOS DONT SHOW A 757 HITTING THE PENTAGON. Now just play the victim card... "what about the passengers" "Are'nt they dead" -- Appealing to... Thats Right! Emotion rather than Reason. 07-09-15 00:06:13 __________________________________________________ | |
hornedbeast91 ::: Favorites before i answer your questions did you see that 48 sec video? cuz its a better representation of what would happen to the plane when it crashes at high speeds 07-09-12 16:06:01 __________________________________________________ | |
EmberSphynx ::: Favorites Even if that were true, then the official story would be false in claiming that the jet fuel were the reason for the missing aircraft. Tell me what you know about the "pilot" who allegedly flew the plane into the Pentagon. 07-09-12 15:15:53 __________________________________________________ | |
hornedbeast91 ::: Favorites look up Plane and concrete wall, that is a much better representation of what happened to the planes instead of slow speed crashes just watch it, its only a minute long 07-09-11 15:27:58 __________________________________________________ | |
EmberSphynx ::: Favorites You want scientific proof? The engines of the 757 weren't at the crash site. The official story: every part of the airplane was vapourized by the jet fuel. It is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for jet fuel to bun hot enough to vapouize the 6 tons of aluminum and titanium alloy. The entire aircaft was missing from the crash site. I'd like to hear your scientific explanation as to where that aircraft went. 07-09-11 07:29:37 __________________________________________________ | |
hornedbeast91 ::: Favorites all the thearies are assumptions not backed up by scientific proof 07-09-09 19:46:22 __________________________________________________ | |
hornedbeast91 ::: Favorites can any of you conspireraters give me scientific proof to back your theories up and dont say watch loose change or give me a link tell me with hard scientific evidence and what it is to provethose theories right. i can do the same thing to prove the theories wrong, you can use refrences from vids but back it up and tell me how not what it is 07-09-09 19:44:56 __________________________________________________ | |
Ranikar ::: Favorites The problem is not that explosives were put on the bottom of the two trade towers, the fact is, suicide bombers from the terrorist ranks could have gone in during all the confusing and with bombs strapped to them blow themselves up. There were lots of terrorists wandering about the US, trying to hijack planes...so why not blame the terrorists? do your research, the entire plot was documented by Maria Ressa, director of CNN Asia who wrote it all in her book 07-09-09 05:16:52 __________________________________________________ |
Saturday, September 15, 2007
9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment